Disability and Religious Accommodations in a Dental Practice
How the ADA, Title VII and state law decide what you must provide for disabled and religious staff — and how to run the process without stumbling.
When a team member needs a change because of a disability or a religious practice, accommodation law decides what your dental practice must provide: a reasonable accommodation, worked out with the employee, unless granting it causes an undue hardship.
The federal ADA and Title VII thresholds sit at 15 employees, but New York, Illinois and California cover smaller practices — and the process and paperwork matter at every size.
Rules vary by state and change
This guide explains federal rules and the state rules it names, as of the date above.
Employment law and dental-practice rules differ by state and are revised often, so confirm current requirements with your state dental board, labor agency or employment counsel before you act on them.
It is general information, not legal advice.
Who is covered by accommodation law
Accommodation duties start with headcount.
ADA Title I defines a covered employer as a person with 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year — the same rung where the EEOC's list of covered federal laws takes in Title VII, the ADA and GINA together, so disability and religion protections arrive at your practice together.
The counting is where small practices get surprised.
The EEOC says a worker can usually be counted as an employee if they have worked for you for at least twenty calendar weeks in this year or last — so some part-time team members can count toward the total, while independent contractors do not.
And with more than one office, the EEOC says that in some cases employees at all worksites can be counted together.
Below 15, do not assume you are out.
The EEOC notes an employer too small for the federal anti-discrimination laws may still be covered by state or local law, and states including New York, Illinois and California reach far below the federal line: the New York State Human Rights Law includes all employers within the state, regardless of size; the Illinois Human Rights Act covers any person employing one or more employees in Illinois during 20 or more calendar weeks, and applies that one-employee threshold to disability claims; and California's FEHA general employment provisions apply to employers regularly employing five or more persons.
Which federal law attaches at which headcount is its own map — see our guide to which laws apply to a small dental practice.
For pregnant team members, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act layers a parallel duty onto the same 15-employee coverage: since June 27, 2023 (with the EEOC regulation in effect June 18, 2024), covered employers must reasonably accommodate known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions unless doing so causes an undue hardship — and you may not require an employee to take leave when another reasonable accommodation would let her keep working.
The EEOC counts more than 30 states and cities with laws requiring employers to accommodate pregnant workers, and California separately bars covered employers from refusing an employee disabled by pregnancy, childbirth or a related condition a reasonable leave of up to four months.
Our guide to accommodating pregnant staff walks that process end to end.
The interactive process
A request rarely arrives with legal wording attached.
Under the EEOC's guidance, an employee can ask in "plain English" and need not mention the ADA or use the phrase "reasonable accommodation" — a wrist that can no longer take hand scaling, or Fridays that must stay free for services, is enough to start the process.
When the limitation or the fix is not obvious, EEOC regulations say it may be necessary to start an informal, interactive process with the individual to identify the precise limitations and possible accommodations.
In practice that is a scheduled conversation, not a hallway exchange: what exactly is the task or schedule that has become a problem, what has the employee already tried, what would let them keep working.
Take notes during it and confirm your understanding in writing afterwards.
If the disability or the need for accommodation is not obvious, you may ask the employee for reasonable documentation about the disability and their functional limitations.
Keep the ask proportionate — under the EEOC's guidance, the documentation is about the disability and the functional limitations.
The employee does not have to accept what you offer.
But under the ADA regulations, an individual who rejects an accommodation necessary to perform an essential function may no longer be considered qualified for the job.
Record what you proposed, what they said, and where you landed — that record is what makes the decision reviewable later.
Essential functions in clinical roles
The ADA's key definition is a qualified individual: someone who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the position.
That definition follows a hygienist from the operatory to the front desk — and it follows you into hiring, where what you may ask an applicant is its own rulebook (see our guide to interview questions).
Which functions are essential is where the statute backs your judgment: it gives weight to the employer's judgment about which functions are essential, and it says a written job description prepared before you advertise or interview applicants is evidence of the essential functions.
EEOC regulations list the evidence that counts, including the employer's judgment, written descriptions prepared before advertising, the amount of time spent performing the function, and the consequences of not requiring it.
Put that to work before a request ever arrives.
Write job descriptions for every clinical role — hygienist, assistant, sterilization tech, front desk — listing the physical and scheduling tasks the role genuinely requires, and keep them on file before the next job ad goes up.
A description drafted for the posting carries weight in a dispute; one reconstructed after a conflict does not meet the statute's before-advertising condition.
When you evaluate a request, two of the listed factors deserve the closest attention in a clinical office: how much of the day the task takes, and what happens to care and production if it stops.
Two limits frame what you owe.
You are not required to eliminate an essential function or lower a production standard as an accommodation — though you may choose to do either.
And the regulations define a direct threat as a significant risk of substantial harm to the health or safety of the individual or others that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation, one that must rest on an individualized assessment.
A diagnosis alone does not answer a safety question; the assessment does.
Undue hardship
Undue hardship is the ADA's limit on all of the above, and the definition is specific: an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, considered in light of the factors the statute sets out.
Read the words carefully — the standard is not inconvenience, disruption, or "we'd rather not," and it is not zero either.
It is a threshold you meet with facts.
So meet it with facts before you deny anything.
Get an actual quote or written estimate for the accommodation.
Write down the impact on the schedule it would change.
List the alternatives you considered and why each falls short.
If cost is your reason, the written number is the difference between a defensible decision and an argument you cannot support later.
That discipline matters because a denial is a decision the employee can test — before the EEOC or a state fair-employment agency.
Before you refuse a request, it is worth a conversation with employment counsel to check whether your facts actually meet the standard — and to confirm you are applying the right one, because the religious-accommodation hardship test below is not the ADA's.
Religious accommodation after Groff v. DeJoy
Religious accommodation runs on Title VII, a different statute with its own hardship test.
Title VII's definition of religion includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless you demonstrate you cannot reasonably accommodate them without undue hardship.
The federal coverage threshold is the same 15-employee line as the ADA, so the two laws tend to arrive at your practice together.
The old shortcut is gone.
Under the pre-Groff reading of Title VII, an employer could refuse a religious request by showing the accommodation cost "more than a de minimis" amount.
In its 2023 Groff decision, the Supreme Court held that a "more than a de minimis cost" showing does not establish undue hardship under Title VII — a change the EEOC's own religion guidance now notes for employers.
If your playbook treats any measurable cost as a green light to say no, rewrite it before the next request lands.
The standard that replaced it: an employer that denies a religious accommodation must show that the burden of granting it would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its particular business.
Both halves of that phrase do work.
"Substantial" sets a higher bar than "any," and "particular business" ties the analysis to your practice — its size, its schedule, its patient commitments — not to the average workplace.
Coworker reaction gets special treatment.
Groff holds that impacts on coworkers are relevant only to the extent those impacts go on to affect the conduct of the business.
"The rest of the team won't like it" is not the test.
A coverage gap you cannot fill, or production the schedule genuinely cannot absorb, is the kind of fact that counts — so document what actually happens to the schedule and the patient flow, not how the change polls in the break room.
In a dental office, a religious request might be a standing swap for a Sabbath shift, an adjusted break for a daily prayer window, or a uniform or dress-code adjustment.
Run every request through the same written process as disability requests, evaluate the business impact with real numbers, and put the reasoning in the file.
Documenting accommodation decisions
Whatever you decide, decide it on paper.
A usable accommodation file contains: the request, in the employee's own words, with the date it arrived; any documentation you requested and received; the options you discussed, including the ones you rejected and why; the accommodation granted or denied, with dollar figures where cost drove the call; and when you will revisit it if the role or the condition changes.
Hold the file with your personnel records.
If your practice is a 15-plus employer covered by Title VII, the ADA and GINA, personnel and employment records generally must be kept one year from the record or the personnel action, whichever is later — and once a discrimination charge under Title VII, the ADA or GINA is filed, all relevant personnel records must be preserved until final disposition.
A charge can arrive long after the conversation, so an accommodation file that disappeared in a clean-up is a problem you built yourself.
Treat the medical parts as sensitive regardless of retention: keep notes and documentation somewhere with narrower access than the general personnel drawer, and share them only with the people who need them to run the process.
Accommodation is one branch of the employment-law rules that switch on as a practice grows.
The dental hiring hub collects the full series — thresholds, pay, leave, screening and the rest.
When an accommodation request lands
- Write down the request in the employee's own words, with the date it arrived.
- Respond promptly and set a time for the interactive-process conversation.
- Pin down the specific task, schedule or limit involved — not the diagnosis.
- If the disability or need is not obvious, you may ask for documentation — keep the ask proportionate.
- List every accommodation considered, including rejected ones, with costs and coverage impacts.
- Check your state's coverage threshold before assuming accommodation law doesn't reach your practice.
- Confirm the outcome in writing and set a date to revisit it.
Questions employers ask
Can I place an employee on leave instead of accommodating them?
Under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, no — a covered employer may not require an employee to take leave if another reasonable accommodation would let her keep working.
For disability requests, leave can come up in the interactive process, but don't lead with it to avoid rearranging a task or a schedule.
Work through the alternatives first and keep notes on each.
Who pays for a reasonable accommodation?
Cost feeds into the undue-hardship analysis, but the ADA's standard is significant expense — not any cost at all.
Get an actual quote and keep it with your notes.
If cost is why you plan to say no, write down the figure and talk to employment counsel before you do.
Other staff object to a schedule change made for religious observance. Is that undue hardship?
Not by itself.
Under the Supreme Court's 2023 Groff decision, impacts on coworkers matter only to the extent they affect the conduct of the business.
Grumbling in the break room does not count; a coverage gap you cannot fill, documented with dates and its effect on production, is the kind of fact that does.
Can I ask an applicant about a visible disability during the hiring process?
Hiring-stage questions are their own rulebook — see our guide to interview questions.
On the job, the ADA's question is narrower: whether this person can perform the essential functions of the position, with or without reasonable accommodation.
That is also the standard your job descriptions should be written around before you advertise.
Sources
- EEOC — Small Business Requirements (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- EEOC — How Do You Count the Number of Employees an Employer Has? (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- 42 U.S.C. 12111 — ADA definitions (Legal Information Institute) (retrieved October 6, 2026)
- 42 U.S.C. 2000gg — Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (Legal Information Institute) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- California Government Code 12926 (FEHA definitions) (retrieved October 6, 2026)
- New York Executive Law 292 (Human Rights Law definitions) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- 775 ILCS 5/2-101 (Illinois Human Rights Act definitions) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- California Government Code 12945 (pregnancy disability leave) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- EEOC — What You Should Know About the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- 29 CFR 1630.2 — ADA regulations, definitions (eCFR) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- 29 CFR 1630.9 — ADA regulations (eCFR) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- EEOC Enforcement Guidance — Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship under the ADA (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e — Title VII (Legal Information Institute) (retrieved October 6, 2026)
- Groff v. DeJoy — U.S. Supreme Court opinion (2023) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- EEOC — Section 12: Religious Discrimination (retrieved October 7, 2026)
- 29 CFR 1602.14 — Title VII/ADA/GINA recordkeeping (eCFR) (retrieved October 7, 2026)
More hiring resources
Hiring for the long term?
Post your opening on DentistryHires and reach dental professionals looking for practices that invest in keeping their teams.

